Skip to main content
Accessibility.com, LLC

CRUZ v. TREEHOUSE CALIFORNIA ALMONDS, LLC

Filed November 11, 2020

Plaintiff

  • Name: Shael Cruz
  • Filing date: November 11, 2020
  • State of filing: New York

Defendant

  • Name: Treehouse California Almonds, LLC
  • Website: www.treehousealmonds.com
  • Industry: Food Products
  • Summary: Treehouse California Almonds, LLC grows and sells bagged almonds and related snack foods.

Case Summary

On November 11, 2020, Shael Cruz filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against Treehouse California Almonds, LLC. Plaintiff Shael Cruz alleges that www.treehousealmonds.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.1 accessibility standard(s).

Case Details

Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

  • Lack of Alternative Text (“alt-text”), or a text equivalent. Alt-text is an invisible code embedded beneath a graphical image on a website. Web accessibility requires that alt-text be coded with each picture so that screen-reading software can speak the alt-text where a sighted user sees pictures, which includes captcha prompts. Alt- text does not change the visual presentation, but instead a text box shows when the cursor moves over the picture. The lack of alt-text on these graphics prevents screen readers from accurately vocalizing a description of the graphics.
  • Empty Links That Contain No Text causing the function or purpose of the link to not be presented to the user. This can introduce confusion for keyboard and screen- reader users;
  • Redundant Links where adjacent links go to the same URL address which results in additional navigation and repetition for keyboard and screen-reader users; and
  • Linked Images Missing Alt-text, which causes problems if an image within a link contains no text and that image does not provide alt-text. A screen reader then has no content to present the user as to the function of the link, including information contained in PDFs.
  • The main "Link List" provided on the home page was programmed so that the descriptive text was stated more than once per mouse over or highlight. This repetitive speech was confusing and would create a barrier for someone without vision or low vision.
    b. When using a keyboard for navigation, the sub-menus, found from the menu options of the Main menu are not properly interpreted by screen readers and are ineffective in either communicating what they contain or provide any information to the user so that they are aware of what is occurring on the website.
  • The company logo acts as a link designed to take the user from wherever they may be within the Defendant's website to the homepage of that site. For this website, the link is not properly labeled and where the link ("logo") will operate properly (taking the user back to the home page), the missing label prevents the user (visually impaired) to interpret the logo/link and in the case of using a screen reader, the screen reader software cannot properly interpret the logo/link effectively hiding the purpose of that link from the user.
  • When using a keyboard for navigation, the sub-menus, found from the menu options of the Main menu are not properly interpreted by screen readers and are ineffective in either communicating what they containor provide any information to the user so that they are aware of what is occurring on the website.
  • Products have text that describe the item's price. The pricing is not labeled to integrate with screen reader, therefore, bars the user from knowing the cost the product is been offered at in order to make a purchase.
  • When select a product for purchase, the "Nutritional Facts" was not labeled to integrate with the screen reader, therefore, bars the user from accessing vital information regarding the product.
  • The website contains information regarding the company and its products on the "about us" page. The texts were not labeled to integrate with a screen reader. This issue prevents the user from accessing the information the site is to convey.

Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

  • VIOLATIONS OF THE ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYSHRL
  • VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYCHRL
  • DECLARATORY RELIEF

Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals
  • A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates its Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
  • An order certifying the Class and Sub-Classes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) & (b)(2) and/or (b)(3), appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative, and his attorneys as Class Counsel
  • Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory and punitive damages and fines, to Plaintiff and the proposed class and subclasses for violations of their civil rights under New York City Human Rights Law and City Law
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees
  • Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

New YorkFood Products