Skip to main content
Accessibility.com, LLC

CRUZ v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP.

Filed November 11, 2020

Plaintiff

  • Name: Shael Cruz
  • Filing date: November 11, 2020
  • State of filing: New York

Defendant

  • Name: Beretta U.S.A. Corp.
  • Website: www.beretta.com
  • Industry: Consumer Goods
  • Summary: Beretta U.S.A. Corp. is a firearms manufacturer, selling handguns, long guns, ammo, and accessories.

Case Summary

On November 11, 2020, Shael Cruz filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against Beretta U.S.A. Corp.. Plaintiff Shael Cruz alleges that www.beretta.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.1 accessibility standard(s).

Case Details

Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

  • Lack of Alternative Text (“alt-text”), or a text equivalent. Alt-text is an invisible code embedded beneath a graphical image on a website. Web accessibility requires that alt-text be coded with each picture so that screen-reading software can speak the alt-text where a sighted user sees pictures, which includes captcha prompts. Alt- text does not change the visual presentation, but instead a text box shows when the cursor moves over the picture. The lack of alt-text on these graphics prevents screen readers from accurately vocalizing a description of the graphics.
  • Empty Links That Contain No Text causing the function or purpose of the link to not be presented to the user. This can introduce confusion for keyboard and screen- reader users;
  • Redundant Links where adjacent links go to the same URL address which results in additional navigation and repetition for keyboard and screen-reader users; and
  • Linked Images Missing Alt-text, which causes problems if an image within a link contains no text and that image does not provide alt-text. A screen reader then has no content to present the user as to the function of the link, including information contained in PDFs.
  • Link like shopping cart was not labeled properly. The alternate text only had a number. This flaw creates a barrier for the user, barring them from knowing what the number is for and, therefore, would not have access to the shopping cart.
  • Site element such as text providing information regarding a raffle was not labeled to integrate with the screen reader. The "enter now" link associated with it is accessible, however, it does not contain a description as to what the "enter now" link is for. The lack of sufficient description keeps the user from fully understanding the information the site is to convey.
  • Product images have text that describe the item's original price and sale price. When the screen reader interprets the pricing, both prices are read but there is no distinction between original and sale prices nor is there any way to determine what price the item is being offered at.
  • Product sizes do not have a proper label as they offer the size as an abbreviated letter (S = small, M = medium, L = large, etc.). When the screen reader interprets the size information, it will read S, M, or L and not the actual size or an explanation and/or description of the size feature or what it relates to.
  • Products have text that describe the item's detail. The description detail was not labeled to integrate with a screen reader, therefore, bars the user from accessing vital information regarding the product.

Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

  • VIOLATIONS OF THE ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYSHRL
  • VIOLATION OF THE NEW YORK STATE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYCHRL
  • DECLARATORY RELIEF

Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals
  • A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates its Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
  • An order certifying the Class and Sub-Classes under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) & (b)(2) and/or (b)(3), appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative, and his attorneys as Class Counsel
  • Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory and punitive damages and fines, to Plaintiff and the proposed class and subclasses for violations of their civil rights under New York City Human Rights Law and City Law
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees
  • Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

New YorkConsumer Goods