Skip to main content
Accessibility.com, LLC

FISCHLER v. HAPPY DOTS AND STRIPES INC.

Filed July 31, 2020

Plaintiff

  • Name: Brian Fischler
  • Filing date: July 31, 2020
  • State of filing: New York

Defendant

  • Name: Happy Dots and Stripes, Inc., d/b/a Araks
  • Website: www.araks.com
  • Industry: Apparel
  • Summary: Araks is a NY based designer Lingerie & Swimwear brand.

Case Summary

On July 31, 2020, Brian Fischler filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against Happy Dots and Stripes, Inc., d/b/a Araks. Plaintiff Brian Fischler alleges that www.araks.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0 accessibility standard(s).

Case Details

Plaintiff alleges issues in its Complaint including the following:

  • Lack of alt-text for images.
  • Tables are not properly labeled.
  • Links use general text like “read more” with no surrounding text explaining the link purpose.
  • Button elements are empty and have no accessible name.
  • Form field labels are not unique on a page or enclosed in a fieldset with a legend that makes the label unique.
  • Approximately twenty (20) headings are empty.

Plaintiff asserts the following cause(s) of action in its Complaint:

  • VIOLATIONS OF THE ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYSHRL
  • VIOLATIONS OF THE NYCHRL
  • DECLARATORY RELIEF

Plaintiff seeks the following relief by way of its Complaint:

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating Title III of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in Title III of the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals
  • A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates the Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
  • An order certifying the Class and Subclasses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) & (b)(2) and/or (b)(3), appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative, and his attorneys as Class Counsel
  • Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory damages, punitive damages and fines
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees
  • Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper

New YorkApparel